hedgewing.ai vs Zacks
If you want calibrated machine-learning price forecasts and institutional-style risk analytics on US stocks at a low monthly price, hedgewing.ai is the closer fit; if you want a long-established, earnings-revision-driven quant rank backed by analyst research reports across a broad universe of stocks, funds, and ETFs, Zacks is the closer fit. They overlap in goal (help you decide what to research) but differ in method: hedgewing.ai is a modern deep-learning forecasting and risk toolkit, while Zacks is a research house whose signal is the Zacks Rank, a proprietary quant model built primarily on the direction of analyst earnings-estimate revisions.
hedgewing.ai (formerly Endeavr) runs a four-model deep-learning ensemble (LSTM, GRU, TCN, and Transformer) combined by a stacking meta-learner, using 45 engineered features. It scores 229 US equities daily with calibrated confidence on 1-, 5-, 10-, and 20-day horizons, walk-forward backtests nightly, and pairs forecasts with institutional risk analytics such as Sharpe, Sortino, VaR at 95/99, Fama-French factor exposures, and HRP allocation, plus daily AI briefs and a data-grounded chatbot. It is US-equities research tooling, not a full data terminal or a broker.
Zacks is a long-running independent research firm. Free registration gives quotes, charts, news, and the headline Zacks Rank; Zacks Premium (around $249/year as of 2026) adds the #1 Rank list, Style Scores and the VGM composite, 45+ predefined screens, equity research reports, and interactive charting, with higher Ultimate tiers for active traders. It covers a far broader universe than hedgewing.ai but its core signal is rules-based quant scoring rather than deep-learning price forecasting, and verifiable backtesting requires the separate Research Wizard add-on.
| Feature | hedgewing.ai | Zacks |
|---|
| Pricing | Free tier with no card (5 analyses/day); Pro $19.99/mo or $199.99/yr; Workspace $49.99/mo with API and team access. | Free with registration; Premium around $249/year (as of 2026, after a 30-day trial); Ultimate around $299/mo or $2,995/yr for active-trader services. |
| AI / ML forecasting | Four-model deep-learning ensemble (LSTM, GRU, TCN, Transformer) with a stacking meta-learner and 45 engineered features; calibrated confidence on 1/5/10/20-day forecasts. | Zacks Rank is a proprietary quant model driven mainly by analyst earnings-estimate revisions and surprises; rules-based scoring rather than deep-learning price forecasting. |
| Backtesting | Walk-forward backtested nightly; backtested results shown in-product (past/backtested performance does not guarantee future results). | Publishes long-run Zacks Rank performance studies; independently runnable screen backtests require the separate Research Wizard add-on, and figures exclude trading costs. |
| Risk analytics | Institutional metrics built in: Sharpe, Sortino, VaR 95/99, Fama-French factor exposures, and HRP allocation. | Focused on rank, Style Scores (Value/Growth/Momentum and VGM) and estimate data; not designed as a portfolio risk-analytics suite. |
| Data breadth | 229 US equities scored daily, with research pages spanning thousands of US stocks and ETFs; US equities only. | Broad coverage across thousands of US stocks plus mutual funds and ETFs, with decades of analyst-estimate history. |
| Charting | Forecast-centric charts and visualizations; not a dedicated technical-charting terminal. | Interactive charting for technical analysis on Premium, more robust than basic apps and competitive with broker platforms. |
| Research reports & briefs | Daily AI-generated briefs and a data-grounded chatbot tied to the model outputs. | Human and quant-driven equity research reports for covered stocks, a long-standing strength. |
| Ease of use | Streamlined single-purpose app focused on scores, forecasts, and risk; minimal setup. | Feature-dense site with many tools and services; more to learn but more breadth once familiar. |
| Free tier | Yes, no credit card; 5 analyses per day. | Yes, with registration: quotes, charts, news, and the Zacks Rank; deeper tools require Premium. |
| Best for | Retail and prosumer users wanting ML forecasts plus quant risk analytics on US equities at a low price. | Investors who value an established earnings-revision rank, Style Scores, and analyst research across a broad universe. |
Choose hedgewing.ai if you want modern deep-learning forecasts with calibrated confidence and institutional risk analytics (Sharpe, Sortino, VaR, Fama-French, HRP) on US equities, packaged affordably with a genuine free tier and an API. It is research tooling, not a data terminal or broker, and its daily scored universe is focused (229 names) rather than exhaustive. Choose Zacks if you want a long-proven, earnings-revision-based quant rank, Style Scores, robust interactive charting, and analyst research reports across a much broader universe of stocks, funds, and ETFs, and you are comfortable paying around $249/year for Premium (with backtesting via the separate Research Wizard). Both are research aids, not investment advice; neither is a registered adviser, and past or backtested performance does not guarantee future results.