hedgewing.ai vs Danelfin
If you want a single AI score that estimates a stock's probability of beating the market over the next three months, Danelfin is the more established, broader-coverage tool. If you want transparent multi-horizon deep-learning forecasts paired with institutional-grade risk analytics (Sharpe, Sortino, VaR, Fama-French factors, HRP) on US equities, hedgewing.ai goes deeper on the modeling and portfolio side. Both are research aids, not investment advice or brokers.
Danelfin assigns every covered security an explainable AI Score from 1 to 10 reflecting its probability of outperforming the market over a roughly three-month horizon, built from a large feature set across technical, fundamental, and sentiment data. As of early 2026 it covers US stocks, a substantially expanded European universe, and US-listed ETFs, which makes it strong for broad screening and ranking across many markets.
hedgewing.ai (formerly Endeavr) takes a model-transparency approach: a four-model deep-learning ensemble (LSTM, GRU, TCN, Transformer) with a stacking meta-learner, 45 engineered features, calibrated confidence on every 1, 5, 10, and 20-day forecast, and nightly walk-forward backtesting. It scores 229 US equities daily with research pages spanning thousands of US stocks and ETFs, and adds risk analytics and AI briefs aimed at being a Bloomberg/QuantConnect alternative at a retail price. Its honest limit: it is US-equities research tooling, not a full data terminal and not a multi-market screener.
| Feature | hedgewing.ai | Danelfin |
|---|
| Starting paid price | Pro $19.99/mo or $199.99/yr; Workspace $49.99/mo (API + team) | Plus around $22/mo ($264/yr); Pro around $59/mo; Elite around $134/mo (as of 2026) |
| Free tier | Free plan: 5 analyses/day, no credit card required | Free plan: top-10 daily newsletter, ~10 reports/month, 1 small portfolio; 14-day trial on paid tiers |
| AI / ML forecasting | Four-model deep-learning ensemble (LSTM, GRU, TCN, Transformer) + stacking meta-learner; calibrated confidence on 1d/5d/10d/20d forecasts | Explainable AI Score (1-10) estimating probability of beating the market over ~3 months, with fundamental/technical/sentiment/low-risk subscores |
| Backtesting | Walk-forward backtested nightly; backtested performance disclosed as not a guarantee of future results | Publishes a long-running backtest of its top-score strategy since 2017; historical AI Scores since 2017 on the top tier |
| Risk analytics | Institutional metrics: Sharpe, Sortino, VaR 95/99, Fama-French factors, HRP allocation | Includes a low-risk subscore and portfolio optimization features; less emphasis on explicit factor/VaR analytics |
| Data breadth / coverage | 229 US equities scored daily; research pages across thousands of US stocks and ETFs (US-equities focused) | US stocks, a large expanded European universe (5,000+), and US-listed ETFs; broader multi-market coverage |
| Ease of use | Per-stock forecasts, daily AI briefs, and a data-grounded chatbot for plain-English questions | Simple 1-10 score with explainable drivers, rankings, and curated trade ideas; quick to scan |
| Best for | US-equity investors who want transparent model forecasts plus portfolio risk analytics at a low price | Investors wanting a single explainable score to screen and rank a broad US and European universe |
Choose Danelfin if you want one explainable AI Score to screen and rank a broad universe that now spans US stocks, thousands of European names, and US-listed ETFs, with a long published backtest and a simple, scannable workflow. Choose hedgewing.ai if you focus on US equities and want transparency into the modeling itself: an ensemble of deep-learning models, calibrated multi-horizon confidence, nightly walk-forward backtests, and institutional risk analytics (Sharpe, Sortino, VaR, Fama-French, HRP) at a lower entry price with a no-card free tier. hedgewing.ai's trade-off is narrower market coverage and the fact that it is research tooling, not a full data terminal or broker. Both are decision-support tools, not investment advice; neither is a registered adviser, and past or backtested performance does not guarantee future results.